/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4655594

>>3322266
>1. Prove that any of them posted here at least once in their life, hard proof
Just how new are you to this board? They posted in study threads, they posted wips and shit in the draw thread that they didn't upload anywhere else, they did redlines, participated in challenge threads etc, what "hard proof" do you want? I know this is a really overused thing to say, but how about you lurk more instead of acting like a retard?

Share the most beautiful, amazing art piece you have ever seen. Whether it be a simple doodle, or a master's work, show us.

I understand pic related makes me seem like bandwagon, but I just can't stop staring at her (in the best way).

>>2462669
not sure if an anon did this

I remember I liked this one a lot

you can describe form with edges and have a low range of values. this is advantageous when creating value structures where multiple objects appear with the same value range i.e. background objects, crowds of people. defining a separate value range for each person in a crowd would break the composition/distract from focal point. edges take precedence in that case.

low contrast(value) also supports color identity but thats treading towards my taste and is not actually relevant

couple of examples; we've all seen it done before

for fun from photoref