/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

I was just goofing when I said the face looked fucky. I think it's interesting. Mostly was mean because
>I'm glad you include your shit with every post because now I can disregard your opinions right then and there without so much as a second thought.
bit of a bahonkus thing to say tbphwyf

>>3568332
the secret is to just phone that shit in brah

>>3558112
no it's memeschlock i made it muhself

>>3541633
>We don't think traditional paintings are bad.
Oh no quite a few of "you all" are very actively opposed to everything that isn't digital. A lot of you get triggered by people producing analog media because digital is still seen as something that weeb faggots do and you're insecure about it. And I love the irony of people with edit+undo and thousands of dollars of computer assistance at their disposal talking shit about someone using a ruler to get exact proportions when prepping a canvas.
>We think YOUR paintings are bad.
Well yeah I'd hope so. I fundamentally despise your incestuous hivemind of virginal losers and your stupid middle school autism rules that you prop up to justify why you don't actually produce anything.

If I was getting positive feedback from you sniveling cucks I would A: have never come back and B: changed up everything I was doing probably. If YOU don't like it, it'll probably be successful lol. Your instincts are garbage.
>Just accept it instead of finding excuses mr dunning.
I'm very intrigued by how you define the dunning-kruger effect, anon. I've made 300 paintings that intentionally demonstrate mistakes and accidents. The learning curve and innovation from ignorance is on full display. The entire point is that it's partially a rejection of illusory superiority and self-importance and stuff. Plus I've created a novel aesthetic that I don't think can really be recreated by anyone else. Plus it's a race against Van Gogh, who famously used grids and every other crutch available at the time, and constantly argued with other artists about it.

Dunning-Kruger to me, is someone like you who likely has zero experience or frame of reference but feels the need to stress how much better they think they are than someone that fundamentally doesn't give a shit. If you were actually well-informed or skilled or whatever you'd demonstrate it, but instead you just call people meme words that you don't really understand.

>>3523768
THERE ARE NO RULES DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTT

>>3525744
>i came here to look at art not read A FUCKING THESIS
tldr
>this is not your blog and you dont have to write reams and reams about your mediocre art and argue for validation.
yeah people generally don't HAVE to do anything.
>holy shit. im not going to ad hominem because your art is competent but for FUCKS SAKE
never met someone so offended by basic literacy.