/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Could someone explain creativity & originality category to me?

Kazoo got 4 points for originality for a girl sitting on a fancy chair.
Choob in the originality category praised that it feels like a book cover and gave her 3 points - but what does it have to do with being creative? Shouldn't that be a part of composition score or materials and media score?
Stutter completely ignored how generic it is and just mentioned composition. NicNac gave her 5 points, basically saying that pic related "shows masterful evidence of creativity and originality in the unique style and expression of it's ideas".

Meanwhile jozu did IMO a very original take on a story with 3 pigs and wolf: https://dad.gallery/submissions/61594 . He got lower creativity score than Kazoo.
Auto, Nicnac and Choob think it was just as creative as pic by kazoo. Choob mentioned "I've never seen this story like this in my life. ", but it clearly didn't affect his score. Stutter praised original concept and gave him 3 points, 1 point less than what Kazoo got.

Clearly I don't understand what creativity is about, because to me Kazoo should get 2, maybe 2,5 points for creativity. Could someone explain to me what's going on?

I'm not even memeing and I don't have anything against Kazoo - she's nice and I like her. I just think judges aren't very fair in this category and I'd like to have an explanation - maybe I just misunderstood this whole thing.