/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6437981
Computers are taking one to one examples and photobashing them
Artists take their perception of the world, which is an imperfect interpretation of reality itself, and makes something in their vision, based on their own DNA that crafted their personality, interests, tastes, and biases. Literally all of these things are missing from the "AI" and no, your prompts don't magically fill these in for the "AI" to shit out your stolen art because you have no input into the actual final image, you're just guessing and being wow'd by the "magical" "AI" doing the work for you.

It's the exact reason AI lerped shit slapped on animations to force "le 60FPS animation" on something that clearly wasn't designed to be 60FPS. Nothing about "AI" gets the nuance of human touch and minds, and never will. It's like thinking some ayy lmao from space will understand human culture even though they have a higher IQ level than us combined. You don't see humans understanding why a ant colony does what it does, they just do. So how is AI going to understand how to do human art? It won't, that's how.