/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6830148
i give up.
it's hard when none of you can make an intelligent, logical point to save your lives.
you realize that mistakes don't disprove what i said, right?
it is not actually a human, nor does it learn exactly like one. the process is similar, and even this is only a point to illustrate that it is in fact learning and applying.

but to you retards this is almost like a religion. as if humans don't make mistakes.
humans and human creativity is holy. it cannot be possibly recreated with AI. that would be blasphemy.
this is pure blind belief.

>It’s almost as if it just mashed shit together based on keywords without a proper understanding of what the thing it’s representing actually is.
then explain to me again how the reflections work.
i pusted 9 images now. it just had those 9 cats ready and knew to add their reflections to the water? how that would look like based on the angle, how the paws could look where they touch the water?
it had those 9 random cats in those exact poses ready?
even the shadows are roughly consistent with the lighting.

this is the very first realization i had with AI, and eventually you'll have it too. once you get past your blind belief that computers can't do what humans can do.
even though it VERY VERY clearly is displaing a part of that ability, right in front of your eyes.