/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6870262
actually if you just go over >>6869990 you can maybe gleam my stance on how art styles come into being in general, and why i hold the positions i do.
i do not think that these things SHOULD be owned by anyone.
they are like single notes in a song. only a part of the whole. the more elaborate the sequence, the more a individual can lay claim to it. but just the concept and ideas on their own? nobody owns those. you cannot own a composition, a color scheme, an eye shape, and many, many other things.