/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1878871
>publisher buys manuscript from author
>wants to publish it for profit
>pays the author
>print run ends
>publisher wants to profit off the same work again
>re-print it
>gives the author a cut because he made the product they're profiting from

I see absolutely zero reason why the same shouldn't apply for the cover illustration, which ultimately is what catches people's attention and creates hype for the book.

Also paper manufacturer sell a product not a license to use an intellectual property you double-nigger.