/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6934750
>I think I speak for 99.9% of the /ic/ community, that we don't welcome AI here and don't plan on changing that stance.
you think. but that is neither true nor is that a number that is set in stone. there are people on the fence from what i can tell.

>given the amount and rate of ai image production, it would drown out the rest of our art on /ic/ if we ever opened the floodgates.
for pure prompt AI flooding, yes. but not necessarily for AI assisted art, which is what i'm actually interested in here.
i'm not for moving /sdg/ or /hdg/ to /ic/.

but some things clearly don't belong on those boards. like how can you look at pic related and say this should be discussed on /g/, where most people can't paint?


>you post it to /ic/...
why do you make it sound like my goal is to post on ic and get critique lol, when it comes to AI, overall i'm more interested in discussing workflows and processes.

>how are you going to stand out? will you even get feedback?
i would stand out the same way i would before it? by making a good piece of work.

>yours looks AI all the same. if you try to let some human flaws remain to show you are doing it yourself, why not go all the way and remove the AI entirely? why do you want to show you are human?
if you say so. i highly doubt you would say that about my actual art outside of this context.
but even the fact that you can convince yourself into thinking the various sketches i provided are AI already says a lot about the situation imo.

>>6931957
meant to post this actually. it's just a part of the OP clip.