/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

THE

how should this one get did up on?

>>3559584
>it's subtle shifts, like the mouth is too broad, the hairline is too dark and too far on either side, the jaw is too broad.
300 paintings. You're dogshit at critique. Are you trying to critique or are you just trying to make yourself feel good about yourself?
>you care too little about the finished artwork.
Yeah they're not done. They are literally all left unfinished. It's a 10 year project and none of them go anywhere until they all do. That's why it's helpful when you highlight specific ones and say what to do to finish them.

I do what anons tell me. I take actual critique and apply it. Of course the irony of it is that this whole board is a bunch of edgy lazy kids that would rather tell me to stop (making it easier for you to continue doing nothing) than make practical suggestions on how to improve.
>tracing is tracing, no matter which way you do it.
And you can't even do that lmao.
> the problem is you don't understand the form of what you are tracing.
Yes I do. I can hand draw faces fine. I have over a decade of art education experience. You're demonstrating that you don't know what you're talking about. Try harder.
>any old lady with too much time on her hand can trace a photo in her sunday painters club.
And yet you impotently do nothing. You have nothing to show for yourself. You don't even have a sunday after painting.
>again, the resulting quality of the painting seems to be of no value to you.
Of course it is. I just value different things that you. You've got a very virginal faggot understanding of art production. Reminds me of me for the ten years I did nothing at all and justified it to myself by thinking "at least I'm not making anything bad."

Nobody will ever be impressed by how much you tell yourself you could make good art if you wanted to.

>>3510518
im working nigga