/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4762181
>Porn is hate speech against poor women who don't want to be objectified
And that's why porn is great.
There's nothing more based that something that degrades the scum that is the female gender.

>>4719504
>>Naughty Dog artist
And that's how you recognize an elitist cunt.

>>4634128
The reason we fail to provide an argument is because you're presenting a subjective interpretation as an absolute fact without any evidence whatsoever.
You're basically stating that the political interpretation of art is inherently a component in the existence of art itself, which is, as the word "interpretation" implies, a SUBJECTIVE view, not a fact. This allows you to just dismiss any counter-argument as non-valid because it doesn't conform to your statement, like this post: >>4634121.
This is inherently a reductive statement, as it fails to take into consideration human appreciation for different subject matters, which is NOT political.

This is the same argument political busybodies utilize to demonize individuals who don't follow their set of politics ("Everything is political, and if something doesn't follow a certain set of politics therefore it is evil and invalid").
For example, radical feminists use the statement "The personal is political" to catalog every action, no matter how inconsequential, as a political statement, which, surprise surprise, was simply an excuse to shame every non-feminist person into accepting feminist ideals by painting individuals as misogynists.

tl;dr We don't provide an argument because you don't provide proof to back up your claim, faggot.