/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5178234
>>5178412
Don't you see anon? Genes are responsible for creating the most powerful artists possible. Asians are coded to have thinner hands and lack body mass compared to other nationalities. They are, by God's design, better suited at precision drawing. They were born to speak faster than most do in their native tongue. They learn faster, they draw faster, they stand for efficiency by nature of their genes. So long as they aren't tainted by the western influence of Disney's works, Asian genes are destined to be aesthetically stronger than other countries. Need I remind you of Japan's cities compared to those drab hellholes Americans find themselves living in? The states are so reliant on conventions to make themselves interesting, an occasion which gathers up Asian made intellectual properties and Asian artists for their alleys. Just as African genes lend themselves to making rap lyrics, Asian genes lend themselves to shut ins, shut ins who funnel their time into drawing to be the artists we see today. That blasted work culture Asia defines itself with went a step further in creating waves of artists who outmatch the rest of the world as well. Gone is the choice to complain about the hand that's dealt, the one job that had an open slot, and in its place is rising up to meet the standards of outsourced animation.

>>4209746
And this, /ic/, is living testament to the impact of genes in our world. The same blood makes them up yet it is gender which gives one the superior artistry. Observe how drawing this small lends itself to the mirco-flicks of the eastern artist, something which not only the western world, but much of this very board, is very much incapable of achieving. God picked a better child and those without talent can do nothing but sulk and pray that they can achieve a measly 20 percent of someone else' finesse.