/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

WHY SHOULD YOU AVOID NSFW :
> "But I love drawing peepee & milkies"
Well, you can do that by staying SFW, like all the great masters that precede you & are universally respected. How so? Draw fine arts. This is not pron, this is what you like to draw, and it will get you tons of respect from a technical standpoint & an artistic standpoint. Normies & art critiques All draw their jaws when they see Michelangelo's David,because it shows tremendous skill to sculpt a naked man so anatomically correct from a rock. Everyone who comes across it will say "Wow,this is high level art,no contest" /"I definitely am not that good"/"This is pure talent".
>Your image/reputation
All these smut artists are hiding themselves, creating alt accounts for a reason. This kind of art is seen as degenerate by A LOT of people. Problem : if you want a lot of fans, no, a lot potential clients, you can count ALL these people out of your range. You can't please everyone,sure, but your success highly depends on the amount of people who like your stuff & are ready to pay you for more.
Can't spread the word to your family (children,aunts,cousins),entourage,colleagues,etc with that.
It's only appropriate in a very specific & intimate context. (you can do it only for yourself though,but don't expect any money/critique/fan in return then)

(part 1)

>>3835596
Hmmmm this is where the discussion gets really interesting too : actual nude statues,for instance. Aren't announcers really against statues like Manneken pis, David or other ultra famous statues shown in museums or in the streets AKA public places? I personally don't think so.
I mean, pic related is acceptable imo. (and I know this painting since I'm 8 years old)

>>2723289
the pieces are all coming together

one step closer to enlightenment

>shamelessly pandering shit
Okay. I will start
>Biblical themes

Top ten masters?