/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3353021
no gesture
no dynamism

>>3350420
1-Pillowshading
2-3/4 view, amateurish as fuck
3-Stiff and bland, lacks any sense of dynamism
4-Clothing has no wrinkles or foldings
5-the font is dog-shit

ITT: stiff symbol drawing and not using ctrl-z enough

use a reference

get the flow of the figure right

use ctrl z until whatever youre drawing is perfect

see tutorial

>>2831470
theres a reason everyone uses wanky abstract concepts to describe the "flow", "tempo" and "moment". its because it cant be described in physical terms. its just nuance. like i said, you need to ask someone else. its clear you wont accept it just from me.

>>2819748

>>2817452
The position is stiff
there is no dynamism
There is no shading or rendering, is plain and boring looking
Arms are 2 heads length (minus shoulders and hands)
The image seems fitting for an ant rather than a person, enlarge it
There are wrinkles on those boxers
There is so much dead space in that background you could rent it. (plus there is no background at all. Is not bad in itself, but if you you are going to have such a big ass space you should put it to good use)
4/10 - Wouldn't wank to it.
It has competent line-art and is not hitler, but definitely not good.
Read the sticky and a figure drawing book.

>>2817294
1- get a scanner app
2-Read the god-damn sticky
It looks amateur as fuck. Why?
>3 quarters view, aka my first drawing
>There are no physics or dynamism on hair
>focus on face seems to be rather cute than expresive of something
>there is no shading
>whats going on with those arms
>clothes have no wrinkles or folds

Pretty boring piece overall, there is nothing going on, or detail, or background. Read the sticky.

>>2624768
The pose mostly.
Looks like it wants to be dynamic but the drawing contracted polio and can't do it properly anymore.
poor drawing :,(

>>2616593
http://miaoqizhu.com/resources/Force_Dynamic_Life_Drawing_for_Animators.pdf

>>2578074
So I don't know if you are baiting but:
>It's stiff, so it kind of defeats the purpose of not being realistic if you are doing nothing with it.
>Slenderman arms.
>ankle and up in the leg looks fat. Not tick, fat.
>it's under-detailed. This is subjective, but it just comes as lazy or boring to me

about your OP,
> color.adobe.com
This should help a lot. Also, my references when trying to do colors are:
>serious sam 1 (original, not HD)
>serious sam second encounter HD
>Kof XIII
>Humanity has declined
>plastic little
You should study them, or at least one of those.
and/or read a color book. vk DOT com SLASH doc25354472_262504889 [james gurney color and lighting]

To fix your drawing, you should read a figure drawing book ( goodreads.com/ebooks/download/147941.Figure_Drawing_for_All_It_s_Worth ) and dynamism in your drawing. You know, something happening in your drawing rather than a robot with polio ( docs.google.com/file/d/0B1h6VscUXcKgR0lEZHR6Mm80aGs/view ). You seem to be doing fine with the coloring and linework but still, you should read a book on the subject.

Seriously, it doesn't look good. But it can if you get better.

Now, go practice:
>>1579290
>>2575666
>>2565542