/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4644755
>nobody is going to stop playing because they are changing the artwork on old cards
That's not the point, Anon. They're not changing the artwork because of artistic reasons or that the pictures are too violent and not suited for every audience; they're doing it in the name of "wokeness".
>Who gives a shit?
You should, if you're an artist.
If they can get a big company who's been around for decades to change old forgotten cards because they're "offensive", what stops those type of people to try to change what YOU draw based on their feelings?

Mind you, not only if you were to work with them, but as a solo artist who posts on social media.
The woke police finds you, and if they do not like what they see, for absurd reasons, they can and will cancel you because nobody will dare to even oppose them, not even the government.
And if you dare even speak against their decisions, well, say goodbye to even making another buck with your work.
You're especially at risk if you have big numbers, because then you're big prey for them.
And no matter how unfair do you think it is, they won't care. You will lose everything you work on for years, because a horde of 25-40 year old childless abominations decides that the girls you draw are better looking than them and you're having success with it.

>>4525246
I'm not usually fond of the weeb titties but fow really has cool art
The illustrators get credited on the cards, so that's a nice thing