/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6299194
That is going far into speculatory territory.
Doesn't have to be technojews shilling for nfts since that market already failed if you've been even passively following that.

Could also be mostly organic interest.
See it from a non-artist-coomer perspective:
"You don't care as long as you get your nut off"

>>6266168
>now prompt her doing some inflation fetish shit... Can't do it? Then commissioned art remains safe.
Give it time.
Coomers will move mountains to get free and fast coom, you still haven't got it.
And with any image altering software you can get results that will satisfy the layman.


>comparing jobs that require higher education and actual engineering skillsets and chemical knowledge with being an artist
>calling other entitled
>prompting others to self reflection
Artist is a valueless title, you pretentious faggot.
Did you build a statue out of shit? Guess you're an artist now.
Did you splatter paint on a canvas in any way? Guess you're an artist now.
Did you draw something, anything, seriously any thing at all? You're an artist.
Did you make a cross upside down? Guess what? You're an artist now.

If you unironically call yourself an artist, you're calling yourself a canned shit eating retard.


It's obvious that the majority of artists don't even like doing art, they like it as long as it nets them attention on themselves, that's why they're so adamant about stopping AI from competing for attention, artists know they'll lose.
That is the beauty of natural selection;
Weak blood doesn't survive.
Maybe being an artist might mean something in the future.