/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6898013
they can do even more with AI.
go through more ideas at once. have specific reference. you think painters wouldn't be inspired by AI output?
maybe not with the current forced stigma. but eventually these things won't matter at all. people will see AI for what it actually is. which is just a machine that can create.

>>6898049
a few, and for free, but i don't like the idea of commissions so yeah. and this adherence to other people's shitty ideas/OCs is part of the reason why.

>>6898019
>Hyung tae kim
wow, haven't heard that name in a while.
interesting stuff.
i'm surprised he lets the AI do faces that much. i wouldn't.
or maybe his style just changed.

>>6898023
>ur not a real artist if you are not on my side!!!!
that's all you're saying. the reality is, real artists are also looking into AI. at least the ones that aren't retarded and just parrot the dumb misinformation that antis say.

>>6885986
i love how you can only react with anger when seeing something obviously useful.

you're the quintessential anti tard.
>it's just making the picture bigger bro!
>it's just extended with nonsense bro!
completely disregarding reality: what it filled in was not nonsense but coherent, which was also the point of the demonstration in the first place.

the video in question was dalle-2 btw. ancient history by now.