/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2957647
Yea, that's exactly what I mean. Next time, just post these kind of questions here. Making a thread about it just pisses people off.
I would make the buildings smaller because right now the impression is that the viewer is very close to them, and like the buildings are all very close to each other. In this case it's not enough to just set two vanishing points for the angle of the buildings. You should first set up your scene using separate vanishing points for the placement of the buildings along the ground. At the very least, have a horizon to base the relative scale and distance of the buildings on. I drew a rough picture to show what I mean. At this distance, the two largest buildings don't give any sense of perspective because you can't see any part of where they begin or end, and there's virtually no perspective going down (I assume you didn't intend for any since this looks like a straight-forward 2-point perspective). If I were to use this picture for anything, it would be as a framing shot in a story, because that's all the buildings to the side do. Also, it feels weird in the way the two buildings in the middle are oriented in relation to the buildings to the side. If the buildings on the side are supposed to be parallel to the buildings in the middle, they're way too big in comparison. The amount of detail on the different buildings seems like off as well, and its uniformity in size and line thickness makes all the buildings feel more packed together. A lot of it feels weird, but I'm not sure what the purpose of the drawing was (perspective, framing device, abstract painting) so I would suggest studying perspective a lot more.
If nothing else, at least zoom out to show more of the buildings and their surroundings.