/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6651135
I believe everything this Anon posted

>>6478333
>based purely on speculation
I did not claim otherwise.
>u-u-u-u-ur just jealous!!!! STOP ASKING QUESTION AND JUST CONSUME!!
No. I want to follow the money. I might be right, or i might be wrong, ultimately i am just following a logic and trying to see it through.
>you wouldn't see csr clones
As far as my own observations go, most of the clones are considered the original, in this case csr, by the average consumer.
And in the case the average consumer knows that they are indeed not csr, why would they spend money on a worse knockoff than the original?
Even then, how do you even know they're not cheating? You must a criminal yourself, since i must be jealous and miserable, right?

We're just talking and shooting the shit here. No need to be such a faggot.
>>6478363
>the reality shows the opposite
Opposite of what?
Mind elaborating on that?