/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3796454
By what metric do you judge and artist's inspiration? Legitimately curious.

>>3685712
>I really have to disagree on you about that
Of course you, because you are fucking stupid. Manga is personal. Anime is just mainstream shit created by a huge team on an assembly line. Any artist with common sense searches mainly in manga for inspiration, not fucking anime.

>There's no reason or evidence manga would have better art quality in general.
Then go and show me a single picture in an anime which looks as good as pic related. Anime obviously has better animations, sure, but manga has better single pictures.

>Anybody here could just as likely to work on "anime" as they are on "manga"
You are clearly just stupid. It makes no sense talking to you. Nobody wastes time with creating 5 second animations, except for some rare autists. Anyone who wants to create stories with this draws manga.

>Neither of them makes more sense than the other.
Then call them simply illustrators, I really don't care. To me they are just doujin artists.

>Definitions shouldn't be affected by your very personal feelings.
Has nothing to do with feelings. It's simply a fact that nobody here will ever do an anime. I did a flip-book once, but that doesn't mean I made anime, fucktard. The defintition of this word means japanese animation movie in the west.

Any talented artist doesn't watch anime anymore anyway. It's clear that only retards dwell here. Manga is the only thing still respected by good artists.
.