/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2063197
>I'm sure I've had conversations about art at an opening but mostly I hear "i like it" or "i don't like it" then "why", ending with "i don't know, just something." There probably isn't a lot to glean from the conversations besides who knows who.

That's very humorous considering what you just said earlier in the thread.

( >>2061848 )

>Terming someones work flippant is just your butthurt and this "arbitrary, boils down, likes it or doesn't" reeks of ARC muh new rennaisance where I'm right bullshit.

You literally just admitted that what that guy you were responding to ( >>2061809 ) said is true, you sneaky little shit. Holy goddamn.

>openings are parties, basically, to celebrate finishing the project, shake hands with friends and strangers alike, and loosen wallets with booze in a heightened celebratory atmosphere.

So you get a bunch of abstractfags (whom barely pass as sane to begin with) piss drunk in order to try and sell them on the elephant-tier shit art you've arranged in your decrepit studio apartment?

This thread just keeps getting better.