/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>1544169
>>1544284
I'm not the other anon, but here are some of my thoughts on it. Overall, very good job with the front and back, only a few proportion errors, and some things can be stated better on the back especially. In the back, the scapula and the spine of it are SUPER important, and should be noted more carefully. Plus you have some things like the erectors of the back going up too high (in a muscled individual like this the trapezius would cover it), and the latissumus dorsi is overstated near the origin by the pelvis.

The side view is pretty bad unfortunately, like it is missing the main forms of the torso and the gesture is not present at all.

Anyways, I tried to fit in as much writing as possible, but didn't have enough room, so I suggest you also take a close look at the redline and see where it differs from your painting, even if only slightly (every difference is intentional).

Overall thoguh, once again, hats off to you it looks pretty great. The knees especially are super nice, I like that you also included the Band of Richter, not a lot of people do that and it bothers me haha! Very solid anatomy demonstrated throughout the drawings.

PS: The acronym ASIS stands for Anterior Superior Iliac Spine in case you didn't know. Also, I recommend trying some dynamic poses instead of the classic textbooks views like this--your knowledge is good enough to try something more interesting. And the little diagram between the back and side views is supposed to be the trapezius, it is pretty small and hard to see though, sorry!