/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7111504
Genuinely curious on your point of view AcademicAnon because I'd like to take the proper direction as best I could.

You're saying Loomis is poison aka counterproductive if someone wants to go "next level"; a level unattainble by begs. Firstly, if a level is unattainable by begs, who is it attainable by? Everyone who isn't an artist is a beg. Are you trying to say that people are just born as artist artists?

Next, how exactly is learning figure construction from Loomis counter productive to reaching this "unattainable next level" ? Couldn't one do Loomis figure construction and then (or simultaneously) study "next level art" ???

Lastly, do you consider yourself as someone who creates "next level material" ?

Again, not tryna fight. Just want to understand