/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3513324
It is correct that, in general, people find dyels that can barely bench a hundred kilos (btw getting there doesn't take a fucking year, how delusional are you) to be the epitomes of physical development (and I agree with that somewhat, Greek aesthetic da best). I would say that pursuing a career in sports/fitness related fields is arguably harder than art because there's waaay less money there and a lot more competition,but I don't have much data to back up this claim, and I don't really mind people disagreeing with that. However, it looks to me that you, an artist presumably, has a higher standard at what you deem to be decent in art related fields, compared to physical development. Like, I personally think that unless you roid, going from a dyel to an ok human takes at least 2-3 years of hard fucking work, decent genetics and an impeccable work ethic. Same can be said about drawing - a somewhat talented young person could be taught this skill in about 3 to 5 years - producing pic related studies after graduating any decent European art uni. Stop trying to put your particular field of interest on a pedestal - people have been doing art for hundreds of thousands of years, it's not something special - it's just one part of our lives.
>>3513314
good luck making it with your reading comprehension skills, brah