/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6854209
If you don't
>instinctively cringe at sex "jokes" that are just an excuse to put lewd images on screen
>only consume media because it has sexually stimulating images
>think that anything that has sex or lewd stuff in it is good because it has lewd and sex stuff in it and try to justify it to be good with the mediocre content it is accompanied by
you're either underage or/and are addicted to porn that you aren't willing to even critically observe something without personal bias.

Good jokes can work even without images.
These type of horny/sex jokes don't work without the lewd images because the lewd images are the main selling point.
You don't read the comics for the jokes, you read them to jerk off over them; you confuse yourself to find it funny because you're having a stimulating response from looking at lewd images.

This isn't a matter of subjective taste of why shit like that is bad.
Only kids, estrogens and non artists argue like that.

These "innuendos" are the equivalent of fart and poop jokes.
They're funny, if you're a kid or straight up retarded.