/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6767634
Women are unable to function like real human beans, because they are used to being coddled by their parents during childhood and validated by their peers and older men when they grow up, hence they don't mentally mature beyond 16 years.
So, of course, if something, anything really, is directly pandering to them, it becomes "problematic".
For creatures that do nothing but open their legs to win at life, they have such insane inflated egos, even the most fucked up disgusting women have egos the size of a planet, just to hide their galaxy size insecurities.
The real problem is that they never work on their issues, but always push it on others and never take accountability for their actions, hence why they demand beauty standards to be lowered.
The critical issue is that such women make up a (loud) majority and no sane individual can come out alive from trying to challenge their insanity, mostly also because other sane individuals see that shit and want to have nothing to do with that.
>this is exactly why women need to be gate-kept from fandoms/hobbies
Exactly. All they do is fuck shit up to profit themselves, either for attention or money.
Art is in its current state because it is mostly women active in it.
They claim to want equality but every action they take contradicts what they say, thus the saying;
>"never listen to what a woman says, only pay attention to what she does"
In general, women are incredibly terrible people and if women don't at least develop some actual sane reasoning or genuine interests instead of chasing highs like junkies, everything they touch will turn to shit.

>>6638085
Never forgetti