/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7110646
>Reilly
I was sincerely hoping that if there's a thread about copying illustrations from learn-to-draw books that someone would mention him thank you anon.
>>7110603
name another glossary from 1940 emphasizing the motor and architectural qualities of the figure, complete with ideally isolated groups to show relationship and interdependence from one body part to the next.
He was loved and admired by his students for seeming to have turned on a light-bulb for them.
>Kimon Nicolaides
with all these teachers you're going to hear about them from a biased group of people called "students that loved their teacher." and even with nicolaides like, name another book for me from 1970(betty edwards publishes after the natural way to draw) that lays out a drawing course whose goal is bridge an experiential connection between your sensory experience and basic act of mark-making.

we STILL don't really understand how people do stuff. These books are just containers of information that can *possibly* facilitate some internal transformation that different people have experienced, in some cases entire classrooms and in some cases teachers that built a part of their standard for teaching based on their teachers.