/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

So coomers in this thread >>5172278

claim you have to draw porn in order to make it. I want to prove them wrong and hopefully convince more anons to avoid going down the Path of Coom

Include the artist's linkedin, patreon, etc. I,E proof of actually getting paid for their art.

Rules


>The artist must be actually good, someone who proves studying your loomis/fundies/gesture/anatomy/etc is a worthwhile investment

>The artist must be employed somewhere, or making at least a decent income through donation services

>The artist can do nudes, but nothing pornographic. It's better if they're outright SFW.

>NO ANIME

Include the artist name and link their socials and stuff. Pic related by Adrian Smith

https://www.artstation.com/adrian-smith

>>5174254
>"Passion" only makes you unpopular, anti-social, and envious of others. It's just cope for bad artists who make boring uninspired work that other SFW artists in India/China do 1000x better.


Holy shit I'm halfway convinced your some leftist shill who wants to demoralize artists who actually give a damn and help push for the further degeneration of art into nothing but soulless coom.

More good, SFW art.