/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3728236
>The more you type, the angrier we all know you are.
mostly just 2drunk2work and 2awakenot2procastinate. Would you like me to be angry? Is that your intention?
>Pathetic.
itsfunnybecauseprojection.png
>Imagine spending this much of your life doing... this
shitposting on 4chan? Why would you need to imagine that? The difference between us is you're an ngmi newfag coward.
>You’re sitting in a dark room surrounded by a bunch of shit tier paintings with a straight face.
I thought I was angry?

>>3651202
mean https://youtu.be/45GkUiuRmjM?t=1118

Yeah Yeah Yeahs song.

The Queen song is all just circlejerk cancer about slowly and repeatedly ruining an idubbz painting with black paint.

EMBRACE

>>3606390
yep

>>3599640
there is no direction. just relative location. numbers are memes. There is no time. Only entropy. It's all an explosion we just developed idiot brains that were developed around being able to anticipate weather behavior and the rotation of the planet around a sun in an infinite entropic process through space tho right?

NAME 5 OTHER PORTRAIT ARTISTS THAT DONT BRUSH THEIR TEETH

ILL WEIGHT

>>3583578
nah uh

I want to do a lovecraft monster painting but I want it to related to muh celebrity goofs and spoofs meme. Should I do like Nic Cage as a giant old gods monster or something?

>>3572614
>i am talking to you so I am trying to use words and ideas even idiots should understand.
it's funny because you don't understand this shit at all.
>this study is looking at people who have already developed a similar level of skill and seeing how many of them are 'intelligent'.
A: What study? The one you made up?
B: It goes without saying that people that excel at technical or creative production are going to be "intelligent." They will undoubtably demonstrate relatively high spatial intelligence. The reason why IQ is generally stupid, particularly for creatives, is that it's basically testing 3 major things. And "artistic geniuses" more often than not are going to score a relatively average IQ score, even if when it comes to spatial awareness you're a fucking mutant.
>it has nothing to do with whether or not talent exists
It does. It's called aptitude. Fluid intelligence, spatial visualization ability, general learning ability etc.
>I am doing the opposite of using 'tryhard vernacular' while literally explaining outright that this is what I am doing.
What? Make pretend nonsense studies? What university do you go to?
>if you are confused and believe I am misusing terms just reread my posts a little more slowly.
You're unambiguously misusing terms and generally making a goofball argument from ignorance it seems like.
> remember that words matter even to dumb people, although maybe not when they are as dumb as you
You seem stupid though. And generally uneducated. Are you 15? were you ever administered an IQ test? What'd you get?

SLEEP DEPRIVATION AND ANARCHY

>>3572270