/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6383282
The type of art you posted is artifice, digitally created, and often vapid in content.
Not that I'm defending fine art grifters, but at least most create actual OBJECTS that attract money launderers—I mean collectors—even if those objects might be literal shit.
To me the best stuff is traditionally drawn art and illustration. Also art with some substance behind it beyond just vapid video game and fan art. Hell, Robert Crumb bought a chateau in France with his sketchbooks.

>>6299395
>Art is WAY more focused on the finished product than chess, for most purposes.
Art is also WAY more than just images.
And that's all AI 'art' is — just images.

>>6299395
>Art is WAY more focused on the finished product than chess, for most purposes.
Art is also WAY more than just images.
And that's all AI art is — just images.

>>5119523
>15000th thread on ai replacing artists
does the sperg who keeps making these threads realize what art even is?

>>4729200
I've rarely (never?) seen an example of very intricate crosshatching done in digital. I've seen comic book style brushwork with some light hatching done, but never anything like the attached.
The medium is just not very conducive to it. There's something about using a crowquill or Rapidograph on good paper that lends itself to intricate linework—that tactile feedback. Digital = highly rendered, airbrushy work (see Artstation).

Robert Crumb

Oh yeah, what makes American comics the best is one of the GREATEST ARTISTS OF ALL TIME, not just American artists, but all artists, is an American comic artist.
That artist is Robert Crumb.

>>4491251
Lazy? No aesthetic?

I guess appreciation for unpretentious craftsmen like Crumb is what separates the men from the boys.