/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3040953
>>3040813
The shading still looks funny and not very smooth.
666petportraits improves it but I think it makes it look too anime like (the type of ) and not sophisticated enough - detail is lost.

Specifically from the original:
Lips shading is v. good.
Clothing shading is v. good
I'm not sure what is going on with the horns either anatomically or in terms of shading - get a reference or fix from the reference.
Nose shading seems too dark (but the shadow underneath it looks good) and face shading is funny - right eye is misshappen on the rightmost side and the shading of both eyes needs to be fixed
Nose shading
Hair shading on the sides is fine but the top fo the hair looks funny and the hairline needs to be fixed
Clothing shading is quite good but could use more detail.

This is a poor reference but the light goes around as it does in your original drawing but not in 666petportrait but other aspects of their version eg the eyes is better.