/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

You know, i see shit posted on the internet and i want to reply, maybe elevate the discussion or offer a perspective and some insight, but these are the two outcomes
>it's just generally bait
>anything i say will just trigger the insecurities and mental illness of the underage retards who know absolutely nothing about anything, can't read beyond a 4th grade level and will overall just try to shut you down
>it will only attract """epic trolls""" and insult spammers
i constantly write comments and delete them because i just know writing anything above 59IQ will just invite miserable bots.

This is the absolute cancerous state of the internet.
Yeah man, you're so funny and witty and you galightmanipulatedoutwittedepictrolledbaited everyone with your buzzwords given to you by the epic youtuber xitter account that ratios everyone and is totally not astroturfed and botted.


Or i could just write passive aggresive brain dead shitposts like everyone else because that would make me seem soooo cool and uncaring and totally not cringe by posting reactionary comments to farm likes and reactions and how it will make everyone mad because my life is so empty that everything i do must be to attempt to affect other people or insults them.
Do you breath oxygen? lmao fucking cringe haha look i chekcmated you epic style fucking gottem you should kill yourself now haha lol lmao you probably can't even breate right haha gottem again tldr schizo hahah lol i am so witty! cope! seethe! AI will replace you! haha u r so mad! gottem again!

What will it take for you subhumans to finally go through with suicide?

>>7454026
Not the one I mentioned. That one are a bunch of platitudes and straight up wrong shit told in a calm manner and edited to sell credibility. For example he says that there are no mainstream original movies anymore, straight up a lie, i've seen Oppenheimer and Barbie. He called Dune a remake of Dune (1984) which is straight up wrong, they are adaptations of the same book but they are not connected to each other.

The most bizarre bit is him saying that "how good a movie is can be objectively measured by the amount of mistakes it has" and his examples are bizarre like luke's force kick. Anyone who is into movies know this is disingenuous critic legitimatized by things like cinema sins and fucking nostalgia critic. Not a single film-maker would say something so stupid, a great example of a director that straight up doesn't give a shit about continuity for example is Spielberg, jurassic park is filled to the brim with continuity errors but no one in their right mind would say that the movie would be objectively better if these errors were "fixed", and if a person truly says that, keep in mind you, a nobody, is questioning Steven Spielberg, I think he has more credibility than you.

That video killed any ounce of credibility this pseudo had with it me