/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7013331
NTA but, did you know people dont price themselves solely by time measures? Did you know some people consider other factors too like, say... the work force and/or the technical knowledge required for the job? or other specific criteria like meters in house painting, for example?

Unless they sit on a wage, people get paid per job, time is but one of many elements to consider when charging yourself.
>t. AC tech assistant

>>6971430
>>6971432
What the fuck are you autists talking about?
One thing is engaging in sexual activitie of any kind with someone (from flirting to fornication) and a completely different one is talking about sexual topics, there is nothing inherently sexual about the latter unless it's used in a sexual context, which was definitely not the case here.
The topic about coom art came up because I wanted to be transparent with my parents about the money I was making on commissions and that conversation went as smoothly as you can think of
>anon that is great and all, but Im not sure if this is something we'd like you to do in the long term
>anon porn is bad and you shouldnt be drawing this kind of stuff
All of this because, lo and behold, my relationship with my parents is extremely healthy where we can talk about pretty much anything without devolving into some moralfagging nonsense.
>and them encouraging you while your underage is uniro
okay, now you're just making shit up.

Honestly, what the fuck are you guys seeing? It almost makes me think you are the sick fucks for seeing sexual connotations in a place there isnt.

>>6971230
Funny, because my mother was less upset and more concerned than anything else, he was straight up outraged kek.

Yes yes yes, it's over, no worth pursuing art, yada yada yada. Could you please shut up already and just give up quietly? Go prompt, get a different hobby or a job, jerk off, kill yourself, anything is better than going to the nearest microphone and scream like an attention whore retard about giving up and shit.

You guys are genuinely stupid.

>6778640
>Im talking to the faggot himself
Why do I feel all this hatred is just you being assblasted all of a sudden...?

>>6474741
>he wants discussion
>doesnt provide source for said discussion
You had one job, OP

>OP's endgame was to shit on porn artists and gatekeep the concepts of art by using *baseless opinions* he got out of his ass and a ""discussion"" as proxy
Due to elements beyond the objective aspects of discussion and logical statement, your discussion and thesis have no merit or value and, therefore, it's worthless. Furthermore, your behaviour have proven to fit the common criteria of "OP" inidviduals that are consider a "faggot".
>Sincerely: A SFW artist who also shits on NSFW artists who dont bother to put any value to their ART.