/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6983827
>>6983840
Not only that, but even if we accepted OP's premise that this kind of art has stopped being produced, he has access to the Internet and, therefore, he can look at A LOT of paintings produced like this in the past.
People who lived when the pieces were being created would be lucky to have seen half a dozen because it had to be in person.

>>6547163
>Paint tutorial
>it's not Windows XP Paint
I swear to God, people love eating shit.

>erased your watermarked
Nigger should be shot.

But other than that, no fucks given.
Watermark if you want, credit/link if you're kind, but no claiming authorship or profiting from other people's art.

As an aside, I love seeing people's OCs being stolen and edited by autistic children who use them as roleplaying material, and then the authors losing their shit over it.