/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3126968
>>3126971
>>3126994
Hey if you guys have criticisms then share it. I didn't come to these conclusions because I just didn't feel like studying.
or you can just use me as a whipping boy. I'm not bothered by it. I'm used to it.

here's an example of what I was speaking of next to a random skull picture I found on Google. The proportions I was speaking of are pretty much constant. It's pretty similar to most of the construction books people share around here but the difference is that it's not implying that you're starting with a completely arbitrary shape. You will start with a shape (the pentagon) that defines the subject you're trying to draw. The length and width of the pentagon, having points at which you can adjust and measure versus a sphere which has no points at which to measure from. I find having these definite points to start from makes constructing a face, and specifically the face I want helps.

I'll continue this unless I keep getting flamed. I'd rather not continue to share thoughts when nobody wants to even consider them or correct me if I have misconceptions. That kind of reaction is purely destructive and I do not want to bait more of it.