/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6991843
>but there's a bit of shame there even to the point where I can feel my face turning red. I get it. It feels like weakness?
I think that's what happens to me and why I find fanfics to be something I shouldnt enjoy the way I do, because they unearth feelings that arent (according to the common opinion) appropriate for a man to have, or to display in public. Seeing it from that perspective, it kind of makes me want to be a bit more shameless about it just to break the stereotype, or just be more proud of me being able to feel so many positive emotions over it as opposed to not feel anything but rejection towards these kinds of emotions.
One step at a time, here's the shit I was reading yesterday:
>https://archiveofourown.org/works/51640966
>https://archiveofourown.org/works/49377799

>>6967651
bbc's response was kind of bad, but this one is a worse response, holy shit.
You do seem, indeed, obsessed. Calm down, anon.

I dont understand why this board, as autistic as it is when it comes to theoretical concepts like fundies and whatnot, is so openly hostile towards graphic design fundamentals such as these.
You can easily apply your understanding of Gesalt theories and other graphic design concepts into your art works because at the end they are fulfill the same purpose of communication through visual mediums, hey are no different than your regular art fundies, some even overlap.
Seriously, why are you guys so allergic to graphic design?

>>6887365
What you're saying essentially boils down to semantics. Theory is meant to explain why something looks good as opposed to being an objective way to make something look good; that is true, but making the conscious effort to apply these theories into your works (when applicable) in a way that functions for the whole piece only results in it being more visually appealing and better at conveying whatever the message is supposed to be. So I dont understand why you paint it as a bad thing.

>>6811563
Not OP, but I think she meant the cringiest art piece you've done.
Thread hasnt even taken off a single post and you're the one bringing up drama.
Calm down...

Im surprised by the amount of people in this board that care so much about the artist's wishes and how much they berate at anyone for doing otherwise. Not that I think it's a bad thing, I think it's kind of wholesome.

I used to believe I was the one in the wrong for telling people to respect my wish of keeping lewds vanilla and that the norm was people not giving a shit about an artist's rules. But turns out it's pretty divided.

>>6764636
I take you didnt understand what I said on that post because...
>First, this isn't a request thread. The OR has no interest in returning fills or contributing in any way, shape, or form.
I was not arguing any of this at all.
>I agree with >6755013 that these are the types of faggots you need to be cautious of
You're agreeing with a post *I* said way back then and to which I still stand to.
>It sounds like you're trying to justify >6764288 what is very openly begging for spite porn and about their personal beef with the creator.
I was not justifying anyone at all. I was just explaining to the anon that asked why someone would beg for spite porn and adding to what the other anon said about how contrarianism can come from the hands of people on your side.