[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.7138799 [View]
File: 616 KB, 1260x1024, dcAIart6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7138799

>>7138780
Here's another AI ink/color from pencils version he posted for proof he drew them. Note how the shield is drawn correctly, yet perspective and shape is fucked in the final version. Why would he make it worse in the final version? AI fucked up coloring/inking or whatever he did. Or he traced the AI art in pencil and made the shield corrct after. I dont know.

One thing is how do artists even prove they drew anything anymore? Do you have to live stream everything you draw? Some things are traced/photobashed even from best artists. Classic artists traced all the time. Famous guys from movements like Art Nouveau traced photographs/images to achieve their styles. Its not 100% tracing stuff, but thats the general process of creating many of those pieces.

It leaves a lot to question on why 'he didnt draw it, the AI did!' is different from the tracing. Manga is all fake backgrounds. even many old manga all the backgrounds and objects are from toner packs. Why many schools/temples are identical. bought the same toner pack and pasted them in. people love the photobashed backgrounds they use in lots of manga. they actually think the cars or motorcycles or detailed backgrounds are drawings when all fake.

but ai is a bridge too far for most.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]