/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>have a model "trained" on data and different works
That means that the program has logged and saved images, of course attached with keywords to be able to differentiate them and where the parts/keywords belong on a canvas.
>input keywords
>program searches for pixels matching the keywords
>programs replicates pixels to form a coherent image that is coherent with the prime directive aka what the image was originally logged in and saved as and what the program is programmed to replicate
>program replicates final image
>the only margin of error is that the program can't tell if it's done a good job or not since it only follows what it is programmed for
>the ultimate goal with the program is to become an infinite image generating machine that can't make mistakes.
>it can never create something truly original, nor can it willingly make mistakes or create art outside of what it is programmed to replicate
It's just automatic photobashing
Would be no different than taking your own work, putting it through a filter or changing the saturation.

Not that this peabrained, no work posting, buzzword spewing schizotranny will ever accept it because muh science.
>BUT ITS DIFFUSION IT LITERALLY DIFFUSES ITS IN THE NAME
Genuine /x/ tier schizo

>>4983397
>online sexual harassment
>Violence against women
They mean porn.
Not the industrial porn, of course not.
And if you dare disagree with women you will be thrown in jail.
This is the future you americunts wished for.
Rejoice.