/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6444037
>AI is a tool, b-b-b-but ur using it wrong and should go to jail
>But ban AI because AI itself steals
>But ban AI because its not real artiste
Make up your mind, faggot.
>No AI is not paper
So, it's not a tool anymore.
Flawless mental gymnastics.
>Learn what LERP means.
Tell me how alternatively a computer can generate images.
Pointing out how it works to make a statement against it, is not an argument that can stand on its own
>The diference is the commandar and imputer are one in the same
That's irrelevant. A tool is a tool. It's the result that counts.
> will shit out its stolen images back at your prompts.
Again: when artist steal and plagiarize work it's ok, but if one image some AI generates even comes closes to an existing image, then it should be accused of every crime.
Again, flawless mental gymnastics.
>Litearlly factually false
Are you unable to apply context to what anyone else says? Go reread that line again.
>u r seething
Try to convince judges and lawyers they're seething when they don't decide to ban AI.
>Again, its a tool and you can do illegal shit with tool
What illegal shit is the AI doing that clearly goes against copyright and intellectual property laws?
Saving images that roam freely on the internet and training a tool isn't illegal no matter how much you want to play the human card.
>Do wrong, get evidence, find evidence, get arrested.
>I don't care what shithole you jeets come from, but don't come to my land and commit crimes k thanks.
Hypocrisy in this two statements alone:
>U HAVE TO HAVE EVIDENCE
>OK AI STEALS BECAUSE I SAY SO AND IF YOU DISAGREE U MUST BE PAJEETS LOL LMAO I AM SUCH GOOD ARGUER AND UR SEETHING
That's all it comes from the "Human" side.
>Humans are not copywritten Jesus Christ on a stick.
>Skin color is not copyrightable Jesus Christ on the moon.
Unless AI does it, right? Because AI bad because..?
>waaaah shitpost
No arguments but only trying to discredit any opposition much like this nigger right here 6444054