/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6079231
>doesn't read
>doesn't understand context
>using the absolute literal definition of a word to justify his entire argument when he doesn't even know what he's actually arguing about
Any fictional representation of a child is based on real children, because children aren't imaginary beings.
And i'll tell you again; you're supporting my initial argument and no amount of
>lol lmao i was just pretending to be retarded
will ever save you from having played yourself from your obvious display of cognitive dissonance; because
>fiction based on a reality = bad
>fiction based on fiction based on reality = good
They should be both bad.