/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6850032
You think you see patterns?
The pattern i see is the usual youtuber pandering to the current active teenage demographic by using relevant victim identity topics;
>abortion
>being jewish
>being mentally ill
This is the ultimate form of
>"wow literally me"
And the equivalent of children's picture books that is also supposed to be emotionally manipulative towards those who don't directly identify with the topics.
And not to mention being outright clickbait.

You have to realize that all the big accounts play a game of algorithms and trends, rather than make organic content.

Imagine; across all story time youtubers, all this shit always happening to one individual yet they all always have time and patience to be chronically online to market their stuff on social media, work on animations and write scripts, record shit and so on.
>inb4 but it's multiple people working on one project and the social media
And there you have your answer.
It's commercialized trash and made up stories presented as something else.

It's the same shit as twitter artists posting the fotm anime girl every day until new fotm appears.
It's all pandering.

>>6478157
What do you want me to elaborate on?
As far as content quality goes, it isn't the creme de la creme that an average coomer would pay a subscription for basically something he will get for free.
The only appeal of such works is the characters from the video games being portrayed erotically, not the erotic work itself, because if you would remove the videogame/anime character, the work would be mediocre at best.
And by that matter, why always fotm and never anything remotely original? Who are they even targeting? The average teenager who just discovered porn will have no money to waste for something he can't even legally pay for and get for free.
This poses the question; Aren't fotm coom pictures just a ploy to simulate interest, by targeting a weak demographic (teenagers) that will spam the internet with the pictures?
If you go on the social media profiles of both sakimi and csr, you see a lot of likes and retweets but few comments and actual organic engagement, which could heavily imply bot usage.
And of course, with all the high numbers and simulated activity combined, no one would doubt the earnings, thus enabling criminals to wash money unbothered and in the public eye.
Of course, anyone who would dare even metaphorically question anything will be called jealous and insane:
>>6478169
>"successful people would never cheat!!"
Sakimi could be very well a ccp plant to siphon western money into chinese govt bank accounts.
If you think this is already
>"schizo and insane"
you wouldn't want to know what world governments do daily and what their classified projects look like.
>>6478191
Yeah, that's the other explanation, but i find it too basic, since googling free shit should be the first thing someone does.
>parasocial
You might have a whale every 1k people, but the numbers just don't make sense.
idk if anyone remembers the twitch thing of last year, where a lot of streamers got outed as washing money for criminals.

>>6300085
>Everyone else seems to be a wannabe artist worried about losing their easy buck.
oh, boy, you really think this is about money? It's worse than that, friendo, it's about the cheap attention they won't be able to get from normies anymore.