/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6934404
>because it proves everyone right otherwise.
do you really believe that?

that i need to make a full piece specifically for this?
if you had a brain, >>6934335 this ALONE would already be irrefutable truth. simply because AI would not be able to create this. the requester admitted it themselves.
so really, why would i spend even more time to prove myself to a dishonest shitter like you?


>...from then on out everyone and anyone can call anything you make ai generated and the claim isn't completely baseless.
yes, but not after i already have disproven it.

>same with getting caught blatantly tracing, once a tracer always a tracer as far as everyone else is concerned.
excuse me, what?

>Maybe you traced over an AI image and copied the colors.
ok, but again, the AI can not do what i drew.
even the requester anon said, quote:
>I asked him to do yotsuba partly because I know you can't prompt her on dalle-3. and stable diffusion sucks with complex poses.

>you'll be discredited!!!!
i'm not worried at all really.
because (when i do start using it openly,) i would have galleries ranging back from long before the age of AI.
none of this affects me in the way you think it does. it's just really annoying at best. but i would never feel discredited due to AI.

>>6934413
you legit have the brain of a child
again, just filter me.
but then you probably don't want others to listen to me either eh?

>>6934415
i mean i based my sketch on that OC? probably too closely. so yes i do blame the source.
i don't even like midgets. at all. (i do get it's still ultimatively my work and if i was better i could have made it better. but it's still not accurate to judge me based on that imo)

>why do you keep showing off the final fantasy character "you" drew then?
lol.
because those are in fact my own characters?
it's not even an """""OC"""""" per se, it's just a random sketch.
it just has a FF vibe maybe. but it's more just my own taste.