/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4249286
>NOOOO you can’t prove Leyendecker DIDN’T use Force™ Drawing®, and I don’t need to provide any evidence to my claims because it lends credibility to my teachings and helps me sell books!
Ok, fag.

>>4249380
Not sure if sarcastic, but construction is a process, not end result. You don’t need to construct figures for them to have form. Let’s say you drew a head using the Reilly method, but then I come around and trace a loomis head on top of the head you drew. It will fit because it’s a fucking head, but it doesn’t mean that is the process you used.

This isn’t an argument against construction, I use construction, but that doesn’t mean some guy centuries ago did when no evidence exists to support it.