/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2066468
>Translation: I don't get easily swayed by random shapes and colors just because it's in a museum and I'm being told the author was a genius.
FIFY

>I went to see Picasso's to prove people he knew how to draw
And here you prove that, besides being an arrogant cunt, you don't know how to draw.
>"I can paint like a master but lol yolo fuck that let's smear some shit on canvas and NEVER paint like a master again"
Said no one ever, except picasso, of course.
>Painting shit in different ways, all without foundation, is a clear sign of skill
Here, you again prove you don't know shit about drawing.
>Picasso was massively influential
Most of his influence comes from his ties to gertrude's family and the fortune spent in giving him gigs and media coverage, just like with pollock, when you get paraded as hot shit, even if you aren't, people believe the hype.
Also, >>2066470 only alludes to the fact that picasso, like all abstract shit really, is only good to get ideas for color palettes, and even then, where is your proof that this is based on picasso? ever heard of color temperature?
Look, I found another background inspired by picasso!