/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6959098
yeah.
luddite is really a fitting insult.
because the luddites at the time also thought there was meaning in destroying the machines. as if that would put the genie back into the bottle.

so here they are, saying this and that, but OBJECTIVELY all they're trying to do is to just stop people from talking about it and sharing shit like pic related.
you people are getting heated over me posting about AI. do you ever wonder why? and why you don't just ignore and filter me?

>>6938826
you sound autistic. expressing my opinion does not mean i seek validation. in fact this is the reason why i only joined the discussion a few months ago as opposed to a year ago.

because i thought i'd let you retard figure this out on your own.
but you didn't. so here i am.

>What drives you to come here as opposed to visiting communities where you can actually have a conversation with likeminded people until it normalizes?
there literaly isn't one. which is why i am here, you retard.
this WOULD be the place to anonymously discuss AI applications to ART. how can you possibly argue that this belongs on /g/, where nobody paints and draws?

i am in one invite only jp discord. but that's a hassle to use due to the language barrier.

>>6938190
i don't even disagree.
but you have to be blind to not see the potential in AI.

just look at this shit. you can make a rectangle and it becomes a wall. a few strokes and it turns into a window, a desk, a plant, a tree.
and you can stop using the AI right there and just keep painting normally.

details and textures?
random objects?
color palettes? the low effort it takes just means you can really play around with it until you settle on something final.

>>6934478
there's barely even tweening AI.
none of this is integrated nor optimized for artists workloads yet. it's just people figuring shit out with a very general tool that isn't optimized for anything.

when you see integration into CSP, blender or animation programs, maybe only then will artists start understanding what i'm saying today.

>>6934484
>so it's my job to believe what some tripfag says on 4chan or I'm dumb?
it's your job to use your head to figure out what is or isn't likely.
otherwise, yes i can and will call you dumb.
but then again you pretty much believe AI is magic so i guess anything could be AI to you.

twice now i made sketches on request for this. i offered to do it a third time itt >>6934380 (i rescind that offer for today btw since it's getting late)

but i'm the dishonest one. sure.

>>6934492
see >>6934335
and i did it again just this weekend. see >>/ic/thread/6928269#p6929440