/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7151996
Because those are relative and extremely subjective but also have a denominator in how works that are
>good and creative
are perceived by the average people

Would stickmen be creative and good? Of course not, it's not like a real photograph.
Would anything that isn't a squeaky clean image be considered good and creative?
Of course not, because it isn't clean.
Would line work be good and creative?
Of course not, because there are no colors and it doesn't replicate life.
Would an illustration of a character no one know and never existed before be good and creative? Of course not, because there is no """frame of reference"""".

Anon, what is good and creative is literally dictated by fucking NPCs who just want to jerk off.
>>7152000
Irrelevant and strawman argument.
Prompt yourself, monkey.

>>6563508
>be me
>draw
>if you're against ai you're whatever aifags say
>if you're for ai you're whatever /aco/trannies say
>trying to reason is met with unbridled faggotry from both sides or one sides playing both sides
>shit on both aitrannies and arttrannies since this shit is all fake outrage and trolling
It's almost too easy defeating both sides because they're low iq and extremely insecure. since they're actual legitimate transsexuals

>>6467483
>The more a market becomes accesible to the average IQ, aka, the working class instead of the rich elite, the worst that market becomes in its products.

Gatekeeping is retarded and its even more retarded to think gatekeeping has some sort control on quality. The reality is production costs money and nothing is done for free (even "free" art). Its minimal risk, minimal overhead and maximum profit. You ask the question why are movies all capeshit trash? the answer is that it sells and meets the demand. Also you are using the term in a guild/union fashion where the labor say for a skilled craftsman was controlled by the guild and work was held to standard to protect the lively hoods of a say a mason.

And btw kiddos
You all just parrot shit you have read your worthless e-celebrities spam and only fear that AI will take away all the potential attention you're so desperate to get

Quit art, it's not for you and get yourself a regular ass job
You would never have been rich and famous
And if you're so scared of AI, it means you would have never been able to surpass it

>>6427473
I fully agree.
>Keep mental tabs
I already keep tabs on artists i should avoid working with or give work to.
AI is just another red flag on their name.

>>6425769
based shitposter