/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7469663
>>7469666

> Both extremes are important
>It's a bit unclear which extremes are you referring to...
Instinctive and logical approaches, within the framework we discuss here: <TC and PC>.

> Aesthetics validates or disapproves
> That's a very binary description. Do you intend that?
Yes.

> Biform
Just imagine a point in a 2D matrix that propagates and closes according to the nature of the information in its current area and neighborhood. It is 'bi' because it is constructed using both brain hemispheres, which alternate (oscillate) depending on the complexity/entropy of the stimulus being interpreted. The nature/pattern and relationship of these closed biforms determine aesthetics. A proper analogy is music, where spatial propagation is replaced by chronological propagation.

> The taste oscillates between 'instinct' and 'will'
> When you say "oscillates"...
'Personal taste' is the historical average of the previously described oscillations.

> I get that you're making a point that SUBOBJ is not well-developed
This isn't that important; I only mention it to highlight the inefficiency of the current language in conveying idea-sensations that haven't been canonized by society and applications.

> DICTRU
> So, if I understand you here – you're finding binary classification statement...

Sometimes, non-canonized concepts are better expressed through 'drawings' (congenital forms):

A DICTRU is:
HOT <----|---->COLD

And DICTRU application in TCP is – assuming exogenous but similar dichotomies –

<---------|--------->
<-------|------>
<----|--->
<--|->
<>

{ <>, <>, <> } : axioms PC -> ~TC.