/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6542392
>there's no way AI could match the creative output of Disney's golden age artists
I'm the anon who posted that image and well, I do agree with that part. AI can produce pretty images, but on its own, it won't produce things with actual intent or personality.
I posted the image because I think the sort of people who mainly think about profits will only care about the cost of things and may think that with AI, artists can produce stuff cheaper and more quickly. They don't care about how "good" the art is as long as they can make money with it. Just look at how much disney moved away from original content and 2D and keeps making soulless remake after remake.
There are already animation studios working with AI, if they ban it in america, they can still outsource the production to poorer countries where the tech is still legal.
I'm not that much of a fan of using AI myself, I've tried it the past week and it just reinforced that I prefer having full control over my lines, even if I can't render like AI does. But regardless:
I slightly disagree with the image I'm posting now, because even with AI, you still need human artists, but I still don't like the part where people want to restrict access to new technology, because it will never be able to be banned completely and the only thing that will happen is that it'll be restricted to rich people only. Which would suck.