/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3417508
So let me get this straight. You are a beginner and you have visible proof that you suck at drawing heads. Yet you believe that this method of yours is still somehow superior to that of extremely accomplished master draftsmen and anatomy teachers with decades of experience, like Loomis, Watts, Vilppu, Hampton, Bridgman, Steven Huston etc?

And yes, of course in the end you will still need to learn the proper shape of the head. But clearly you haven't done that. Those "meme" Loomis heads are structurally and proportionally way more accurate and sound in their simplistic geometric abstraction than your "proper head shape" drawings are.

>>2970045
Then stop reading fun with a pencil for the 1241234 time you fucking autist. Loomis presents you with a method to do a basic head construction that is simple yet effective so you can draw any type of head in any type of style in proper perspective. Just how fucking stupid are people who unironically do nothing but copy the FWAP cartoon heads and then complain about Loomis?

>>2254648
i'm not good but your skull is way too big