/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3571811
>so what you're saying is you don't want women to undress in front of you so you can stare at their naked bodies for three hours...
I'm sure it's a great time had by all. Do you play music or offer booze or drugs or payment for those 3 hours or you just awkwardly paint nudey cuties from Barnes and Noble or wherever in sober asexual silence?

>>3545594
>shit art with an innovative meaning is still shit art.
dope. I call it memeschlock.
>it looks like you did everything in one layer
generally a process of layering. ones that keep me driven get more attention. Shit like >>3545421 is what I work on when I have extra paint from something else.
>and to not build upon your work implies that your first and only layer is perfect - which, in art cannot exist
wabi sabi brah.
>I hope you took the time to read
I did not.
>I know this is partially bait and I was frustrated by your ignorance
good you should be
>but we weren't getting anywhere
one must imagine sisyphus happy

>>3530222
who?

>>3506038
The "suicide" is "hearsay" kind of. There's the theory that he was partying with some buddies, one of which was a kind of retarded guy that was obsessed with cowboys and walked around with a revolver. I buy into the theory that Van Gogh was accidentally shot, but didn't to fuck over his mate so he said he did it.

But the mutilation wasn't really "hearsay." He cut his ear off in the middle of a kind of manic episode after having a fight with Gauguin. We know this from his letters.

Like it's possible that he was lying but that's still not really "hearsay."