/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3622883
>why don't you talk more about a few dozen soulless artists on the payroll of a soulless company making soulless art for a soulless game?
Who knows? There's lots of things /ic/ doesn't talk about. Why not start a thread for the topic and dump some artwork as a conversation piece?

Be the change you want to see ^ w^~~

A chronic and vocal malcontent which is the only reason why he collabed with a shit-tier artist like Steven Pastis since they're cut from the same cloth.

>>3277487
>but wasn't aware that putting numbers on vehicles was "his thing" lol
It's funny how a person can admit ignorance and show stupidity while still trying to condescend. It's not "putting numbers" on vehicles you fucking dolt, you'd have to project some of your own total lack of common sense on to me to think I'm saying that. It's simply the number 5, it's a trademark of his.

Keep in mind my making you aware of this will ultimately be to your benefit. If you were to put together a design portfolio of vehicles with 5's on them you'd look like a complete Robertson wannabe without even knowing much about who he is. Wouldn't want that would we? So be grateful I've given you this largess of knowledge~

>>3236662
I like yours, anon

>>2973030
A composition is only fundamentally changed if it reads differently. Both images look the same if you squint, therefore the composition is unchanged. A few details are changed, and composition elements are reinforced with value and color, but everything is basically the same, just adjusted, and imo for the better (well except for the tits. KJG's tits are much more uhhhhhh tasty)

I really wish /ic/ would understand the difference between minor and major flaws and understand critique on minor flaws alone is nitpicking.

>>2583965
Thank you so much